<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is eharmony wrong for excluding gays and lesbians?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:18:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: roxcomp</title>
		<link>http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/comment-page-1/#comment-963</link>
		<dc:creator>roxcomp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/#comment-963</guid>
		<description>I think its right that they exclude gays and other wayward sexualities. In my opinion we don&#039;t need to make gay a normal thing for our society so children can grow up to experiment and get messed up. But about e harmony im kind of interested about reading their mission statement and seeing in print that their goal is to bring together a man and woman.

I mean people can argue that love is love and you should be with whoever you want to be with. Next you know people want to have 3-people getting married. Animal and people marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its right that they exclude gays and other wayward sexualities. In my opinion we don&#8217;t need to make gay a normal thing for our society so children can grow up to experiment and get messed up. But about e harmony im kind of interested about reading their mission statement and seeing in print that their goal is to bring together a man and woman.</p>
<p>I mean people can argue that love is love and you should be with whoever you want to be with. Next you know people want to have 3-people getting married. Animal and people marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenna</title>
		<link>http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/comment-page-1/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/#comment-962</guid>
		<description>Hell yes! If they do that, that is terrible! Love is love and you can&#039;t help who you want to be with. I am bi and I like both. I can lean either way. I think that is very rude towards LGBTs looking for a match. Uuugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell yes! If they do that, that is terrible! Love is love and you can&#8217;t help who you want to be with. I am bi and I like both. I can lean either way. I think that is very rude towards LGBTs looking for a match. Uuugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M,k</title>
		<link>http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/comment-page-1/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>M,k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/#comment-961</guid>
		<description>thats such bad human rights!

Of coarse its WRONG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats such bad human rights!</p>
<p>Of coarse its WRONG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ori Sever</title>
		<link>http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/comment-page-1/#comment-960</link>
		<dc:creator>Ori Sever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/#comment-960</guid>
		<description>It isn&#039;t right.  Legal, but not all things legal are right. All I have to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t right.  Legal, but not all things legal are right. All I have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy M</title>
		<link>http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/comment-page-1/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/#comment-959</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a private company with religious backing.  Sort of like a private club.  It&#039;s their rules.   men looking for females and vs. There are many men only or women only groups out there and no one seems to mind except someone with a personal &#039;agenda&#039;  Why hassel to go there?  There are plenty of gay friendly dating sites. It would be odd for a straight guy to join one looking for a female, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a private company with religious backing.  Sort of like a private club.  It&#8217;s their rules.   men looking for females and vs. There are many men only or women only groups out there and no one seems to mind except someone with a personal &#8216;agenda&#8217;  Why hassel to go there?  There are plenty of gay friendly dating sites. It would be odd for a straight guy to join one looking for a female, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cjmjm1</title>
		<link>http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/comment-page-1/#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>cjmjm1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/#comment-958</guid>
		<description>I think it is wrong, but if they are a private company they can do whatever they want. If it were a government company then they&#039;d get a lawsuit.

There are other sites that do the same thing . even if i was single and they did start allowing gays i wouldn&#039;t join it because it would probably give bigoted questions for gays</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is wrong, but if they are a private company they can do whatever they want. If it were a government company then they&#8217;d get a lawsuit.</p>
<p>There are other sites that do the same thing . even if i was single and they did start allowing gays i wouldn&#8217;t join it because it would probably give bigoted questions for gays</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/comment-page-1/#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/#comment-957</guid>
		<description>yes they r wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes they r wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ?!</title>
		<link>http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/comment-page-1/#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>?!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/#comment-956</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s necessarily unethical, but it&#039;s certainly a bad business move. They&#039;re would attract more customers if they allowed LGB people to use the service too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s necessarily unethical, but it&#8217;s certainly a bad business move. They&#8217;re would attract more customers if they allowed LGB people to use the service too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razz</title>
		<link>http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/comment-page-1/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>Razz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/#comment-955</guid>
		<description>Who says that it is more than 10% of the population?

That number is a lie, that is causing gay people to be discredited.

I believe that the Constitution has a clause about &quot;Freedom of Association.&quot;

Or does the Constitution only apply when we want it to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who says that it is more than 10% of the population?</p>
<p>That number is a lie, that is causing gay people to be discredited.</p>
<p>I believe that the Constitution has a clause about &#8220;Freedom of Association.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or does the Constitution only apply when we want it to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E_Tard</title>
		<link>http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/comment-page-1/#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>E_Tard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secondtalk.com/is-eharmony-wrong-for-excluding-gays-and-lesbians/#comment-954</guid>
		<description>I think the real reason is that the gays and lesbians don&#039;t need an online service to help them find love. See, e-harmony knows this - and they are disallowing the few who do want to join up because they know it will destroy the straight folks - seeing how it&#039;s REALLY supposed to be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the real reason is that the gays and lesbians don&#8217;t need an online service to help them find love. See, e-harmony knows this &#8211; and they are disallowing the few who do want to join up because they know it will destroy the straight folks &#8211; seeing how it&#8217;s REALLY supposed to be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
